American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Certification Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the ABIM Certification Exam. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions, with hints and explanations for each. Get ready to succeed!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


How often should follow-up monitoring occur in patients with early-stage breast cancer after treatment?

  1. Annually for the life of the patient

  2. Every 3 to 6 months for 3 years, then every 6 to 12 months for 2 years, then annually

  3. Every month for the first year

  4. Only when symptoms arise

The correct answer is: Every 3 to 6 months for 3 years, then every 6 to 12 months for 2 years, then annually

The recommended follow-up monitoring schedule for patients with early-stage breast cancer after treatment is structured to balance the need for surveillance with the patient's quality of life. This regimen involves regular assessments to detect any signs of recurrence while minimizing undue anxiety from too frequent visits. Beginning with monitoring every 3 to 6 months for the first three years allows healthcare providers to closely observe any potential recurrence or new symptoms in an early stage when interventions may still be effective. The subsequent transition to follow-ups every 6 to 12 months over the next two years strikes a balance by reducing frequency as the risk of recurrence diminishes with time. Finally, annual visits for the life of the patient provide ongoing reassurance and care continuity, keeping the lines of communication open between the patient and their healthcare team. Other options, such as annually for the life of the patient without the earlier intensified follow-ups, would not sufficiently address the higher risk in the initial years post-treatment. Monthly check-ins would likely cause unnecessary stress and logistical burdens for the patient, while only conducting follow-ups when symptoms arise could lead to late-stage detection of recurrence, which is not ideal for effective management of the disease. Thus, the outlined approach is both evidence-based and patient-centered.